| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000077 | Frama-C | Plug-in > Eva | public | 2009-05-05 22:00 | 2014-02-12 16:56 | ||||
| Reporter | pascal | ||||||||
| Assigned To | pascal | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||||
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
| Product Version | Frama-C GIT, precise the release id | ||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | Frama-C Beryllium-20090601-beta1 | |||||||
| Summary | 0000077: if((int)(&a+2)) fails to warn about being unspecified | ||||||||
| Description | see summary. This is related to bug 76, which is fixed and partially fixes this problem too: at least the condition is correctly analyzed as being 0 or 1. But the policy is to emit an alarm (that is complicated to express, but that's another issue) and to consider the condition to be 1 modulo the verification of the alarm. | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Attached Files |
| ||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
| Notes |
|
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
| Notes |
| Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-05-05 22:00 | pascal | New Issue | |
| 2009-05-05 22:00 | pascal | Status | new => assigned |
| 2009-05-05 22:00 | pascal | Assigned To | => pascal |
| 2009-05-06 15:50 | svn | ||
| 2009-05-06 15:50 | svn | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2009-05-06 15:50 | svn | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2009-06-23 18:02 | signoles | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2009-06-23 18:03 | signoles | Fixed in Version | => Frama-C Beryllium beta-1 |
| 2013-12-19 01:13 | pascal | Source_changeset_attached | => framac master 102d243c |
| 2014-02-12 16:56 | pascal | Source_changeset_attached | => framac stable/neon 102d243c |
| 2018-01-12 14:26 | signoles | Category | Plug-in > value analysis => Plug-in > Eva |
| Issue History |